Cybersecurity buyers dismiss claims and verify everything. We build acquisition programs on proof, not promises, so your pipeline fills with prospects who trust the product before your AE ever joins a call.
Your buying committee includes five people, and none of them trust marketing
A single deal touches a security engineer running the POC, a CISO signing off on risk, and procurement checking the contract. Most cybersecurity vendors write one message and blast it at all three, which reads as noise to every one of them.
The category is noisy, and every claim sounds alike
Every homepage in security says 'AI-powered,' 'next-gen,' and 'comprehensive protection.' Technical buyers have learned to filter that language out entirely. Lean on adjectives instead of evidence and you're competing for attention in a channel that has already tuned out the category's vocabulary.
Your sales cycle is lengthy, and your pipeline math can't withstand it
Enterprise security deals run 4 to 9 months once legal, security review, and a proof-of-concept are added in. Most acquisition plans run on 30-day attribution windows that can't account for a buyer who first read your blog in month one and signed in month seven. Without a model that tracks the whole cycle, you underinvest in channels that work or kill them too early.
Trust signals are scattered rather than integrated into the funnel
SOC 2 reports, pen test summaries, and customer references usually live in a folder someone emails on request instead of sitting where a skeptical buyer hits friction. That gap costs you deals silently – nobody tells you they left because they couldn't find proof, they just stop responding.
We begin by mapping your real buying committee, rather than relying on a generic persona sheet. That means working with your sales team to uncover the actual objections security engineers raise during a POC, the risk language CISOs use when rejecting a deal, and the procurement friction that kills opportunities after the technical win. This forms the foundation of every message we write, because in security, a wrong audience assumption can sink the entire campaign.
Next, we audit your existing acquisition channels against the places cybersecurity buyers actually use to research vendors: security communities, analyst content, peer review platforms like Gartner Peer Insights and G2's security categories, and the technical content prospects seek out when comparing vendors head to head. Most cybersecurity companies put budget into channels designed for SaaS buyers with 30-day cycles, rather than the compliance-driven, committee-based journey their real deals follow.
We then design the acquisition motion around proof rather than positioning. That means transforming your SOC 2 report, pen test results, and architecture documentation into acquisition assets – a security page that addresses the CISO's risk questions before the first call, technical content created by someone who has configured the product, and a POC-to-pipeline process that makes the sandbox or trial the main conversion event, rather than a form fill.
For paid and outbound, we create campaigns segmented by committee role: content and ads for the security engineer assessing technical fit, a distinct track for the CISO evaluating risk and vendor consolidation, and account-based plays for the procurement phase where deals tend to stall.
Measurement is rebuilt to reflect your actual sales cycle. We implement multi-touch attribution that credits content read in month two even when the buyer converts in month six, and measure pipeline velocity by committee stage, rather than only top-of-funnel volume.
Deliverables arrive in working increments, not as one strategy deck at the finish: a buying-committee map detailing each role's objections and triggers, a rebuilt channel mix, trust assets placed wherever buyers encounter friction, segmented campaigns running in market, and an attribution model built for a multi-month sales cycle – all connected to your CRM so sales has visibility.
A cybersecurity buyer puts more trust in your pen test report than your homepage – so center the funnel on the report, not the homepage.
We deliver this through a 90-day sprint, rather than an open-ended retainer. Cybersecurity acquisition issues are generally specific and solvable – the wrong channel mix, absent trust assets, attribution that doesn't reflect the sales cycle – and a fixed sprint pushes us to diagnose and ship instead of slipping into ongoing content production that never fixes the root problem.
Phase one (days 1-30) focuses on diagnosis: mapping the buying committee, auditing channels, and pinpointing where a lack of proof causes technical buyers to leave the funnel. Phase two (days 31-60) covers build and launch: trust assets go live, segmented campaigns are launched, and attribution is connected to your CRM so you can track movement by committee stage, not only leads. Phase three (days 61-90) centers on measurement and handoff: we assess real pipeline data, remove anything that isn't converting security engineers or CISOs specifically, and give your team a system it can operate independently.
We aren't offering a standalone content calendar or media plan. Each channel decision is evaluated against whether it brings an actual committee member closer to a POC or signed contract – when a tactic fails to create a measurable change in qualified pipeline by day 60, we cut it instead of letting it continue on the strength of an attractive dashboard.
The opening 30 days are focused heavily on discovery: we interview your sales team, join live POC calls when possible, and review win/loss data to learn what is truly driving deals or causing them to fail. By day 30, you'll have the buying-committee map and a prioritized breakdown of what's broken.
Days 31-60 cover build and launch. We create the security page copy, develop campaign briefs, configure attribution in your CRM, and collaborate with your design or dev resources to add trust assets to the site as they become ready, rather than waiting for one major reveal.
Days 61-90 focus on measurement, iteration, and handoff. We analyze real campaign data by committee role, stop anything that isn't generating qualified pipeline, and scale what is. By the end, your team has a documented system that covers channel mix, buyer-role messaging, and how to interpret attribution data moving forward.
You work with one lead who runs point and joins your weekly call, supported by whoever the sprint requires – a writer experienced in technical security content, a paid media specialist, and a CRM/ops person to connect attribution. We staff for the sprint, not with a large account team.
If your cybersecurity company needs customer acquisition leadership, we should talk.
Let us take a custom approach to your growth goals by assembling and leading the best-in-class marketing team to support your next stage.
Sprints generally cost $8K-$20K per month based on scope – from a full channel and trust-asset rebuild to targeted work on one area such as paid or content. We define the scope after the first working session, once we understand what's genuinely broken. We don't offer a flat-rate package because a Series A vendor without a security page and a growth-stage vendor managing three broken paid channels require different levels of work.
With a 4-9 month enterprise sales cycle, you should expect meaningful pipeline progress during the 90-day sprint – more security engineers beginning POCs and more conversations advancing to the CISO – rather than closed revenue by day 90. Deals generated by campaigns launched in month one usually close 3-6 months after the sprint concludes, which is why the attribution model is just as important as the campaigns.
We operate within your current tools – CRM, marketing automation, Slack – instead of creating a separate system. Sales shares the real objections heard on POC calls, while marketing takes ownership of executing anything we hand off. At the sprint's end, the system works without us needing to be in the room.
Most agencies working with security companies fall back on standard B2B SaaS playbooks – lead magnets, broad demand gen, monthly content calendars – because those tactics scale across their client roster. We design around the security buying committee and a proof-led sales motion, working within a fixed 90-day sprint with clear deliverables rather than an indefinite retainer that never reaches completion.
We create multi-touch attribution connected to your CRM's deal stages, rather than tracking only form fills, so a whitepaper viewed in month two receives credit alongside a demo request in month five. We measure pipeline velocity by committee role – whether the security engineer reaches a POC faster and whether the CISO engages sooner – as leading indicators long before closed revenue appears.
It is helpful, but you don't need it to begin. If certification is underway, we shape the funnel around the assets you already have – pen test summaries, architecture documentation – and time the trust-asset rollout around your certification schedule. What we won't do is make compliance claims you can't support; security buyers check these claims.
Series A to growth-stage cybersecurity vendors generating roughly $5M-$100M ARR that have product-market fit and a functioning sales process, but need acquisition designed for a genuine security buying committee rather than a generic SaaS funnel. If you're pre-revenue or an enterprise vendor with an established demand gen team, this isn't the right model.
Yes. We regularly collaborate with an existing paid media buyer or content agency, supplying the buying-committee strategy and trust-asset framework for them to execute. We'll be direct if a channel or vendor relationship isn't performing, but we won't require a complete replacement when part of your existing setup works.
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 229 – Longevity Medicine’s Dirty Secret with Jim Donnelly
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 224 – The Bootstrapper’s Revenge with Alex Roy
Tuesday, August 25, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 234 – Nobody Has The Playbook Yet with Dave Steer
Tuesday, August 18, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 233 – Stop Writing Only for Humans with Jesus Requena
Ready to unlock your growth?
Book Free Call