AR and VR companies build products with complex JavaScript-rendered interfaces, heavy 3D assets, and frequently changing platform documentation – none of which search engines handle well by default. Winston Francois audits the specific technical layers that block indexation and rankings for immersive tech companies, then fixes them. We have done this for companies at Series A through growth stage and know what breaks first.
JavaScript-Heavy Frontends Block Crawling Before Your Content Has a Chance
Most AR and VR product sites and developer portals are built on frameworks like React, Vue, or Three.js, where content is rendered client-side. Google's crawler frequently fails to execute this JavaScript correctly, meaning your product pages, SDK documentation, and use-case landing pages never make it into the index at all. The result is that developers and enterprise buyers searching for your specific platform capabilities find your competitors instead. This is not a content problem – it is a rendering problem that requires server-side or hybrid rendering configuration to fix.
3D Asset Pages Create Performance Scores That Kill Rankings
Demo pages, interactive experiences, and product showcases in the AR and VR space routinely include large WebGL scenes, video files, and spatial audio assets. These assets inflate your Core Web Vitals scores – particularly Largest Contentful Paint and Cumulative Layout Shift – to the point where Google actively deprioritizes your pages in mobile search. Enterprise buyers and developer audiences still search on desktop, but mobile performance now affects all rankings. Fixing this requires asset optimization strategies specific to spatial content, not generic image compression advice.
Platform and SDK Documentation Goes Unindexed or Ranks for Nothing Useful
AR and VR companies frequently publish large volumes of technical documentation – API references, SDK guides, platform specs – that should drive developer acquisition from search. But without structured URL hierarchies, proper canonical tags, and consistent internal linking, these pages either fail to index or rank only for exact-match queries with near-zero volume. Developers searching for solutions to integration problems never land on your docs. This represents a significant acquisition gap because developers who find your docs through search convert at high rates when the content is actually useful.
Structured Data for Immersive Experiences Has No Standard Template
E-commerce, SaaS, and media categories have well-established schema.org patterns that drive rich results in search. AR and VR companies exist between categories – your products are software, hardware, platforms, and experiences simultaneously. Without correct structured data, your listings show as generic blue links while competitors with less interesting products appear with star ratings, pricing information, and product highlights. Implementing schema that accurately represents what you build, without triggering Google's quality guidelines, requires judgment calls that generic SEO tools cannot make.
We start with a technical audit that goes deeper than a standard crawl report. For AR and VR companies, the meaningful signals are in the rendering layer – what the Googlebot actually sees versus what a human browser sees.
From the audit, we build a 90-day technical roadmap that sequences fixes by impact. Not everything is equally important. A developer-focused AR platform has different priority ordering than a consumer VR marketplace.
On execution, we embed directly with your engineering team. One of the most consistent failures we see is technical SEO recommendations that never get built because they were written in a format engineers could not act on. Our team writes implementation specs with the level of detail your developers expect: specific configuration changes, code samples, expected output, and testing criteria.
For AR and VR companies with developer audiences, we treat your technical documentation as a distinct SEO surface. Docs sites need their own crawl configuration, internal linking structure, and schema strategy. We audit your developer portal separately from your marketing site and apply the fixes that move developer acquisition through search – which for many immersive tech companies is the highest-value organic channel they are currently ignoring.
Measurement is built into the engagement from day one. We set up tracking that connects technical SEO changes to business outcomes: developer signups from organic, enterprise demo requests from search, and SDK download conversion rates. We use Google Search Console combined with your product analytics to close the loop between search performance and revenue signals, so leadership can see what the technical work is producing.
For most AR and VR companies, the indexation problem is upstream of the content problem. Google is not ranking your pages lower because the content is weak – it is not indexing them at all because the JavaScript never finishes executing. Fix rendering first, then worry about keywords.
Our engagements run in three phases across 90 days. The first 30 days are audit and architecture: we crawl your full domain, run rendering diagnostics, map your internal link graph, and interview your engineering and product teams to understand the constraints you are actually working with. At the end of this phase you have a ranked list of technical issues with business impact estimates and a sequenced fix plan.
Days 31 through 60 are execution. We work inside your engineering sprints to get fixes shipped. For most AR and VR companies this phase addresses rendering configuration, page speed for 3D-heavy pages, and the foundational structured data layer. We run continuous monitoring so we can detect if a deployment breaks something we fixed and flag it immediately.
Days 61 through 90 shift to iteration and measurement. Technical SEO changes take time to flow through Google's crawl and index cycle, so this phase is partly about tracking progress on the changes from phase two and partly about identifying the next layer of opportunities – typically documentation coverage and long-tail developer query capture. Most clients who see meaningful results continue beyond the initial 90 days, moving to a retainer that maintains the work already done while expanding into new content and authority building. What makes this different from a consulting engagement is that we operate like an internal team that happens to specialize in technical SEO, not an outside vendor producing recommendations.
The first 30 days are structured around discovery and audit. We crawl your full site, run rendering tests, audit Core Web Vitals across device types, and review your Search Console data for indexation anomalies. By the end of week four you have a complete picture of your technical SEO health and a prioritized fix list. We present this to engineering and leadership together so there is shared understanding of what we are fixing and why.
Days 31 through 60 are active execution. We assign a technical SEO specialist who joins your engineering team's communication channels and participates in your sprint cycle. Every fix we scope goes through your development process – we write the specs, your team ships the code, we validate the output. This is not us watching from the outside and writing recommendations; we are accountable to the same sprint deadlines your engineers are.
Monthly we run a performance review that covers indexation rate changes, Core Web Vitals trends, and organic traffic movement broken out by page type. We connect these numbers to business metrics – demo requests, developer signups, SDK installs from organic sources – so the SEO work stays tied to outcomes that matter to your leadership team.
Most AR and VR companies see meaningful indexation improvements within 60 to 90 days of fixes being shipped. Full ranking movement on competitive terms takes longer – typically three to six months from the time the technical foundation is solid. Engagements typically run six to twelve months for companies starting from a significant technical deficit.
If your ar / vr / metaverse company needs technical seo leadership, we should talk.
Let us take a custom approach to your growth goals by assembling and leading the best-in-class marketing team to support your next stage.
Engagements typically run between $15,000 and $35,000 per month depending on the size of your site, the complexity of your technical architecture, and the amount of embedded execution work required. A company with a single marketing site and a developer portal at the lower end of complexity sits closer to $15,000.
Technical fixes that improve indexation – rendering configuration, crawl budget, canonicalization – typically show up in Search Console data within four to eight weeks of being shipped, assuming Google recrawls at its normal rate for your domain. Core Web Vitals improvements can appear in ranking signals within a similar window.
We join your engineering team's Slack or Teams channels and participate in sprint planning during the execution phase. We do not operate as an external vendor sending monthly reports – we write implementation tickets that go directly into your project management system, attend stand-ups when relevant, and are reachable when your developers have questions about our specs.
Most technical SEO agencies produce audit reports and recommendations. We produce engineering specifications and then embed with your team to get them shipped.
We set up tracking that connects organic search performance to the business outcomes that matter for your stage: developer signups, SDK installs, enterprise demo requests, or trial conversions. We use Google Search Console for search performance data and connect it to your product analytics to trace the path from search impression to business event.
We work best with AR and VR companies that have at least a small engineering team, because technical SEO changes require code changes and we need engineering capacity to ship them. In terms of stage, Series A through growth stage companies are the most common fit – early enough that the technical foundation has not been locked in for years, established enough to have a real site with real traffic to protect and grow.
Tuesday, July 7, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 227 – The Three-Sided Growth Problem with Robin Izsak-Tseng
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 226 – The $10 Million Rule with Seth Lowery
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 218 – The Sephora of Chocolate Strategy with Pashmina De Shon
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 225 – The Taylor Swift Effect with Blakely Neilson
Ready to unlock your growth?
Book Free Call