
Most SaaS companies at $5M-$100M ARR have real product-market fit and a leaky funnel. Trials start and stall. Demo requests go cold. Pricing pages bleed intent. We fix the conversion layer – systematically, not with a redesign.
Trial-to-Paid Rates Are Quietly Killing Growth
Median B2B SaaS trial-to-paid rates still sit in the 15-25% range heading into late 2026. If yours is below that, you're losing customers you already paid to acquire through ads, content, or outbound. The acquisition team hits its targets while the conversion layer bleeds the budget. Nobody on the org chart owns the gap between 'started trial' and 'became customer,' so it never gets fixed.
Pricing Pages Built on Gut, Not Data
Most SaaS pricing pages were built once, then only touched when a VP complained about the copy. There's no session recording review, no test calendar, no hypothesis log. A page converting at 2% could hit 5% with the right tier structure and anchor pricing – but nobody is running that experiment because nobody owns pricing-page performance.
Onboarding That Assumes Too Much
Your team built onboarding around how they understand the product, not how a first-time user experiences it. Empty states, internal jargon, and missing proof at the moment a user needs confidence all kill momentum. Users who don't reach an 'aha' moment in the first session rarely come back for a second one – and most teams have no idea where in the flow that moment gets lost.
No Measurement System, So No Learning
CRO without instrumentation is just redesign with extra steps. Most teams lack step-by-step funnel tracking that shows exactly where users drop – trial signup, first login, key feature activation, upgrade prompt. Without that visibility, every 'optimization' is a guess, every test lacks a real baseline, and teams end up celebrating statistical noise as a win.
We start with a full funnel audit. We pull your analytics, watch session recordings, review signup and onboarding flows, and map every conversion handoff from ad click to activated user to paid customer. This isn't an opinion exercise – we're looking for measurable friction: where users stop, where they hesitate, what's missing that would push them forward.
From that audit, we build a prioritized CRO roadmap tied to your broader [growth strategy](/services/strategy/). We rank experiments by expected revenue impact against implementation effort. Some wins move fast – a pricing page restructure, a sharper trial welcome email, a clearer CTA hierarchy. Others take longer. We fix the highest-impact leaks first instead of chasing whatever tactic is trending that quarter.
Execution runs in sprints. Each sprint has a hypothesis, a test design, a measurement plan, and a defined pass/fail bar before it ships. We work inside your existing team or build the test assets ourselves – landing page variants, email sequences, in-app messaging, onboarding changes. Nothing goes live without a way to measure whether it worked.
The [creative](/services/creative/) work inside CRO gets underrated. Copy, layout, and message hierarchy drive more lift than button-color tests ever will. We write conversion copy grounded in how your best customers actually describe the problem you solve for them, pulled from customer interviews, support tickets, and review sites – not from an internal brainstorm.
Mid-funnel is where most SaaS companies at this revenue range leave the most money on the table. Demo-to-close rates, trial upgrade sequences, and expansion triggers on underused accounts are all conversion problems, not just sales problems. Our [marketing](/services/marketing/) work covers the full funnel – nurture sequences for cold trials, reactivation flows for churned users, and expansion prompts for accounts sitting on unused capacity.
Every experiment feeds a shared learning log. Win or lose, we document what we tested, what it taught us, and how it changes the next sprint's priorities. By day 90 you have a CRO playbook your own team can run – not a permanent dependency on an outside shop for every future test.
The output isn't a prettier funnel. It's a measurable lift in trial-to-paid, free-to-paid, or demo-to-close, depending on your model – tied back to [measurement](/services/measurement/) frameworks that show real revenue impact, not just a percentage-point change sitting in isolation.
Acquisition gets the budget. Conversion gets ignored. A 3-point lift in trial-to-paid rate is often worth more than doubling your ad spend – and costs a fraction as much to achieve.
We run CRO on a 90-day sprint model. The first 30 days are pure diagnosis – audit, instrumentation, baseline measurement, and prioritization. We don't launch a single test until we know exactly where the leaks are and what a meaningful lift is worth in dollar terms.
Days 31-60 are execution. We run the highest-priority experiments, build the creative assets, and push them live. Each test runs to statistical significance – we don't call winners early to look productive. Every test lives in a shared tracker your team can read in real time.
Days 61-90 are iteration and handoff. We run follow-on experiments based on what the first round taught us, lock winning variants into the permanent funnel, and finish the playbook. By day 90, your team knows what to test next, how to run it, and how to measure it without us in the room.
Every CRO engagement opens with a two-week diagnostic sprint before we touch anything live. That means pulling your analytics data, reviewing session recordings, auditing onboarding emails, and interviewing three to five recent churned trial users where possible. This gives us a fact-based starting point instead of a set of assumptions dressed up as a plan.
Weeks three through eight are active experimentation. We run two to four experiments in parallel, owning test design, asset creation, and statistical tracking. You get a weekly update showing active tests, results to date, and what's next – no filler, just numbers.
Weeks nine through twelve are consolidation. Winning variants get built into the permanent product. Losing tests get documented with the learning captured, not buried. We build the internal playbook and run a handoff session so your team can keep testing without us.
After the initial 90 days, most clients move to a monthly retainer where we run ongoing experiments and own continuous funnel improvement. But the 90-day sprint is built to deliver standalone value even if you stop there.
If your saas / tech company needs conversion rate optimization leadership, we should talk.

Let us take a custom approach to your growth goals by assembling and leading the best-in-class marketing team to support your next stage.
It depends on your traffic volume – more traffic means tests reach statistical significance faster. In most B2B SaaS contexts, individual experiments run two to four weeks, and you'll see the first validated wins around the six-week mark. The compounding effect of a full 90-day sprint, with multiple winners stacked, is where meaningful revenue impact shows up. We don't quote a timeline before we've seen your actual funnel data.
Not for most experiments. We work with front-end testing tools like VWO or Optimizely for changes that don't require engineering. For deeper onboarding changes or in-app flow modifications, we work alongside your engineering team with clearly scoped specs. The goal is to keep the engineering lift on your side as light as possible while still running experiments that actually move the needle.
It depends on your business model. For product-led growth companies, we focus on trial-to-paid rate and time-to-activation. For sales-led businesses, we focus on demo conversion rates and trial-to-meeting booking. For freemium products, we track free-to-paid upgrade rates. We define the right north star metric during the audit phase based on where your model actually converts – vanity metrics like page views don't factor in.
A freelancer typically runs individual tests in isolation. We build a system – instrumentation, a prioritization framework, experiment documentation, and a playbook your team inherits at the end. We also connect CRO to your broader [growth strategy](/services/strategy/) and [marketing](/services/marketing/) work so experiments aren't running in a vacuum. The other difference is accountability: we tie our work to revenue impact, not experiment volume.
Then we work alongside them, not against them. Product teams typically optimize for feature adoption and retention. CRO work focuses on the pre-activation and monetization moments product teams often deprioritize. We can audit what's already been tested, identify gaps, and run experiments in the parts of the funnel with no coverage. There's rarely overlap – there's usually a lot of untouched territory between acquisition and product.
Yes. The tactics differ but the discipline is the same: find where users drop off, form a hypothesis about why, test a fix, and measure the outcome against a real baseline. For PLG companies, the work centers on onboarding, activation, and upgrade triggers. For sales-led companies, we focus on demo request pages, lead nurture sequences, and trial experience. We've built playbooks for both models and know where they overlap.
At minimum: access to your analytics platform (Mixpanel, Amplitude, GA4, or similar), access to your email platform, and a working login to your product. Session recording access through Hotjar, FullStory, or LogRocket is a major plus. We'll also want time with your sales team and, where possible, a few churned trial users. The richer the data going in, the faster we identify the highest-impact experiments instead of guessing.
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 242 – Why AI Slop Backfires with Nicole Cassese
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 224 – The Bootstrapper’s Revenge with Alex Roy
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 241 – What AI Still Can’t Do with Will Sartorius
Tuesday, October 6, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 240 – Commerce for Weirdos with Bryan House
Ready to unlock your growth?
Book Free Call