
Most B2C brands at Series A and B have data but no insights — surveys nobody reads, NPS scores without context, cohort reports that tell you what happened but not why. We build the research infrastructure that connects consumer behavior to decisions your team can act on, fast.
Product teams build for the loudest customers, not the most valuable ones
In B2C, the customers who give feedback are rarely representative of your best customers. Power users, early adopters, and the vocal minority shape your roadmap while your highest-LTV segments stay silent. Without structured research to identify and segment your most valuable cohorts, product investment goes toward features that generate noise but don't drive retention or revenue growth.
Marketing spends against the wrong message because nobody asked customers what they actually value
B2C brands consistently over-index on features in their marketing while consumers are buying outcomes. 'Sleep tracker with HRV monitoring' loses to 'wake up feeling rested' every time. The gap between how you describe your product and what consumers actually want is a direct cost — you're paying to reach people who would buy if you said the right thing, and they're not converting because you're saying the wrong thing.
Churn attribution is guesswork without exit research
When B2C companies lose subscribers or repeat buyers, the instinct is to attribute it to price or product gaps. The actual drivers are often different: friction in the experience, unmet expectations set by marketing, competitive pressure from a specific alternative, or a life event that changed the use case. Without structured exit research, you're fixing the wrong levers and watching the same churn patterns repeat.
Competitive blind spots grow until a new entrant takes market share
B2C markets move fast. A competitor launching a new positioning angle, pricing model, or channel strategy can shift consumer perception in months. Most growth-stage B2C brands don't have a systematic way to monitor competitive positioning and consumer preference shifts — they find out through traffic drops and CAC increases, not from proactive monitoring.
We start every market research engagement with a research agenda — a specific set of questions your business needs answered to make better decisions in the next 90 days. We don't run research for its own sake. The research plan maps to specific decisions: Which new markets should we enter? What's driving trial-to-paid conversion? Why are customers in this cohort churning at month three? Answering these questions with rigor changes what you build and where you spend.
For consumer research, we design and run qualitative and quantitative studies depending on what the question requires. Qualitative — interviews, focus groups, diary studies — gives you the 'why' behind behaviors. Quantitative — surveys, A/B testing analysis, cohort comparisons — gives you the 'how many' and 'how often.' We know which method to use for which question. Most in-house teams default to surveys because they're fast; we push back when a survey will give you misleading confidence instead of real insight.
Segmentation is where market research becomes commercially valuable. We identify your highest-value customer segments — defined by LTV, not just acquisition volume — and build profiles that your product and marketing teams can actually use. Not demographic personas that sit in a deck, but behavioral segments tied to specific triggers, motivations, and purchase drivers. Your growth strategy performs better when you're targeting the right people with the right message.
Competitive intelligence is part of every engagement. We track how competitors are positioning, what consumers are saying about them, and where market share is moving. For B2C brands at Series A and B, staying ahead of this is an active practice, not a quarterly check-in.
We deliver research in formats your team can use: executive briefs for leadership decisions, tactical guides for product and marketing teams, and raw data for your analysts. We stay involved through the decision — we don't drop a report and leave.
Most B2C brands have more data than they have insight. The problem isn't measurement — it's that nobody is asking the right questions. Market research that starts with a business decision and works backward to the method gets used. Research that starts with a methodology gets ignored.
Our market research engagements run in 90-day cycles tied to specific business questions. The first phase is always a research agenda: what decisions need to be made, what data already exists, and what we need to go collect. This framing prevents the common failure mode of running research that produces interesting findings nobody acts on.
Execution phase runs weeks three through ten. For qualitative work, we recruit and interview target consumers, run analysis, and develop insight frameworks. For quantitative work, we design surveys, run them at statistically significant sample sizes, and analyze results against your cohort data. We combine both wherever the question requires it — qualitative to develop hypotheses, quantitative to validate them at scale.
The final phase is a research readout built for action. We present findings with specific recommendations, not just observations. Every insight we deliver comes with a 'so what' — what this means for your product roadmap, your marketing message, or your growth strategy. We follow up 30 days later to see how the research is being applied and what's working.
B2C market research engagements start with a half-day research agenda session — we work with your leadership team to identify the three to five decisions that need data to move forward. This shapes the entire engagement and ensures we're building research your team will actually use.
Days ten through sixty are execution: recruiting participants, running studies, collecting data, and producing analysis. We keep you informed on progress weekly but don't bog you down in research process details — you see the work when it's ready to be useful.
The final four weeks cover synthesis and delivery. We produce the research outputs, walk your team through the findings, and work with you on the implications for roadmap, messaging, and strategy. Most engagements are three to four months, with ongoing research programs available for companies that want a standing insights capability.
What we need from you: access to your existing customer data, a clear decision-maker who can act on research outputs, and willingness to challenge assumptions when the data contradicts them.
If your b2c company needs market research & insights leadership, we should talk.

Let us take a custom approach to your growth goals by assembling and leading the best-in-class marketing team to support your next stage.
The cost depends on the scope of the research — how many studies, what methods, and how large the sample sizes need to be. A focused engagement answering two or three specific business questions runs less than hiring a full-time insights manager. A broader segmentation and competitive intelligence program costs more but replaces a function most growth-stage B2C companies can't staff internally. We scope after the initial consultation once we understand what decisions you need to make.
A focused qualitative study — five to ten consumer interviews with analysis — can complete in three to four weeks. A quantitative survey program takes four to six weeks from design to results. A full segmentation study with both qualitative and quantitative components runs eight to twelve weeks. The timeline depends entirely on how clear the research questions are at the start and how quickly we can recruit the right participants.
We embed with both teams, not just leadership. That means attending roadmap planning and campaign briefing sessions so research is integrated into decisions while they're still being made, not presented afterward. We deliver research in the format each team needs: executive summaries for leadership, tactical guides for marketing, and detailed data for product. The goal is that research becomes part of how your teams make decisions, not a separate function they consult occasionally.
Traditional research firms deliver reports. We deliver decisions. The difference is that we stay involved from research design through implementation — we're not done when the final deck is presented. We also run research tied to commercial outcomes, not academic rigor for its own sake. If a research method is slower and more expensive than it needs to be to answer the question, we use the faster one.
We track research-to-decision conversion: did the research actually change what you built or how you marketed? We also track downstream outcomes tied to research-driven decisions — conversion rate changes after message-market fit work, churn reduction after exit research informs retention strategy. Research ROI is harder to attribute than paid media, but a decision made with data instead of gut has a measurable difference in outcome rates.
B2C companies at Series A and B who have product-market fit and are now trying to scale — these are the companies where research pays the biggest dividends. You have enough customers to study, enough data to analyze, and decisions ahead of you (new markets, retention programs, product roadmap) that are worth making carefully. Pre-product-market-fit, research is often premature. Post-Series B, you should have an in-house research function. The middle is where we add the most value.
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 212 – Getting Your Mind Right for Growth with Dan Kessler
Tuesday, April 7, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 214 – Why Billionaires Pay Him a Retainer with Leigh Rowan
Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 213 – Buy a SaaS, Skip the Startup with Doug Breaker
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Frank Growth – Episode 211 – Kill the CMO Role with Elia Wallen
Ready to unlock your growth?
Book Free Call